The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November-December (1997 vol.17)
pp: 46-52
ABSTRACT
The design of effective human-machine interfaces is one of the more challenging and exciting issues facing engineers today. Many virtual environment (VE) designers approach this problem by examining how humans interact with their natural environment. In essence, they attempt to mimic the various methods that humans use to gather information via the sensory modalities. The intent of this approach is to present task-relevant information in a form that is familiar, compellingly realistic, and intuitive to humans. Now VE designers seek ways to coordinate visual information with other sensory modalities. As part of our research on multimodal VE interfaces, the authors of this article supplemented a visual display with direct vestibular stimulation to add tilting and rolling sensations to training VEs. They discuss here their method and rationale and report the results from several experiments using vestibular stimulation in a training VE.
CITATION
Lawrence J. Hettinger, James A. Cunningham, Gary E. Riccio, Jeffrey D. Cress, Grant R. McMillan, "Integrating Vestibular Displays for VE and Airborne Applications", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.17, no. 6, pp. 46-52, November-December 1997, doi:10.1109/38.626969
REFERENCES
1. J.A. Cunningham et al., "Assessing Target Detection Performance Using Head Position Data: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis," Proc. Eighth Int'l Symp. on Aviation Psychology, 1995, pp. 158-163.
2. B.J. Brickman et al., "Haptic Specification of Environmental Events: Implications for the Design of Adaptive Virtual Interfaces," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Symp., IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1996, pp. 147-153.
3. National Research Council, Virtual Reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges, Nat'l Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995.
4. J. Dichgans and T. Brandt, "Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control," Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Volume VIII: Perception, R. Held, H.W. Leibowitz, and H.L. Teuber, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972, pp. 315-349.
5. D.A. Robinson, "Eye Movement Control in Primates," Science, Vol. 161, 1968, pp. 1219-1224.
6. L.J. Hettinger and G.E. Riccio, "Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Virtual Environments," Presence, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. 306-310.
7. R.M. Held and N.I. Durlach, "Telepresence," Presence, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. 109-112.
8. A.C. Coats, "Sinusoidal Galvanic Body-Sway Response," Archives of Otolaryngology, Vol. 74, 1972, pp. 155-166.
9. E. Dzendolet, "Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation of the Human Vestibular System," Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 17, 1963, pp. 171-185.
10. F. Hlavacka and C. Njiokiktjien, "Sinusoidal Galvanic Stimulation of the Labyrinths and Postural Responses," Physiologia Bohemoslovaca, Vol. 35, 1986, pp. 63-70.
11. G.E. Riccio et al., Functional Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Vestibular System, Tech. Report AL-TR-1995-0014, Armstrong Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1995.
12. H.C. Berthold and E. Dzendolet, "Sensed Movement to Sinusoidal Angular and Electrical Stimulation," Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 36, 1973, pp. 23-32.
13. J.D. Cress, "An Initial Evaluation of a Direct Vestibular Display in a Virtual Environment," Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting, 1996, pp. 1131-1135.
5 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool