The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - May (1995 vol.15)
pp: 29-37
ABSTRACT
In parallel with the well-known developments in computer graphics to produce photorealistic imagery there have been a number of interesting attempts to widen the range of output possibilities. In particular, there has been a thrust towards creating systems that simulate the sort of natural media that artists use. Some of these attempts are reviewed and, from them, the concept of 'expressive' or non-photorealistic rendering is developed. Expressive rendering goes further than simulation of natural media: it aims to encourage new forms of image-making. Some of the possibilities are illustrated by output from the Piranesi system.
INDEX TERMS
photorealism, nonphotorealistic rendering, 2D/3D rendering techniques
CITATION
John Lansdown, Simon Schofield, "Expressive Rendering: A Review of Nonphotorealistic Techniques", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.15, no. 3, pp. 29-37, May 1995, doi:10.1109/38.376610
REFERENCES
1. B. Wooley, Virtual Worlds: A Journey in Hype and Hyperreality,Blackwell, London, 1992.
2. S. Strassman, “Hairy Brushes,” Computer Graphics, Vol. 20, No. 4, Aug. 1986, pp. 225-231.
3. P. Haeberli, “Paint by Numbers: Abstract Image Representation,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), Vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 207-214.
4. E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion,Phaidon, London, 1960.
5. L. Mezei, M. Puzin, and P. Conroy, “Simulation of Patterns of Nature by Computer Graphics,” Information Processing (IFIP Conf. Proc.), Vol. 74, 1974, pp. 861-865.
6. M. Barnsley et al., “Harnessing Chaos for Image Synthesis,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), Vol. 22, No. 4, Aug. 1988, pp. 131-140.
7. J. Lansdown, “Chaos, Design and Creativity,” in Fractals and Chaos, A.J. Crilly, R.A. Earnshaw, and H. Jones, eds., Springer, New York, 1992.
8. M.F. Barnsley, Fractals Everywhere, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1988.
9. M. Barnsley and P. Hurd, Fractal Image Compression, AK Peters, Wellesley, Mass., 1992.
10. T. Cockshott, Wet and Sticky: A Novel Model for Computer-Based Painting, doctoral dissertation, Glasgow University, Glasgow, Scotland, 1991.
11. T. Cockshott et al., “Modeling the Texture of Paint,” Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics 92 Proc.), Vol. 11, No. 3, Sept. 1992, pp. C217-C226.
12. W.D. van Bakergen and G. Obata, “Free-hand Plotting: Is It Live or Is It Digital?” in CAD Futures 91, G.N. Schmitt, ed., Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1992, pp. 567-582.
13. W.T. Mitchell, The Reconfigured Eye, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.
14. T.T. Sasada, “Drawing Natural Scenery by Computer Graphics,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 19, No. 4, May 1987, pp. 212-218.
15. P. Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer, The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
16. M. Aono and T. L. Kunii, “Botanical Tree Image Generation,” IEEE CG&A, Vol. 4, No. 5, May 1984, pp. 10-33.
17. T. Saito and T. Takahashi, “Comprehensible Rendering of 3D Shapes,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), Vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 197-206.
18. P. van Berkal, “SIAS: Strokes Interpreted Animation Sequences,” Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 1989, pp. 35-47.
19. G. Winkenbach and D.H. Salesin, “Computer-Generated Pen-and-Ink Illustration,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), Vol. 28, No. 4, Oct. 1994, pp. 91-108.
20. S. Schofield and P. Richens, “The Piranesi System,” working paper, Martin Centre, Cambridge, England, 1994.
21. S. Schofield, Nonphotorealistic Rendering, doctoral dissertation, Middlesex Univ., Faculty of Art, Design, and Performing Arts, Middlesex, England, 1994.
13 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool