This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Three Ways to Show 3D Fluid Flow
September/October 1994 (vol. 14 no. 5)
pp. 33-39

Visualizing 3D fluid flow fields presents a challenge to scientific visualization, mainly because no natural visual representation of 3D vector fields exists. We can readily recognize geometric objects, color, and texture: unfortunately for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) researchers, vector fields are harder to grasp. Thus, we must construct simplified representations that human observers can understand. Simplification means focusing on relevant aspects of the flow. This offers many options, making a wide variety of flow visualization techniques both feasible and desirable. This article presents an overview of three different visualization techniques developed in the Netherlands. The three useful techniques for visualizing 3D flows are: implicit stream surfaces, turbulent particle animation, and a flow probe.

1. J.J. van Wijk, "Implicit Stream Surfaces,"Proc. Visualization 93, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1993, pp. 245-252.
2. A.J.S. Hin and F.H. Post, "Visualization of Turbulent Flow with Particles,"Proc. Visualization 93, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1993, pp. 46-52.
3. W.C. de Leeuw and J.J. van Wijk, "A Probe for Local Flow Field Visualization,"Proc. Visualization 93, IEEE Computer Science Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1993 pp. 39-45.
4. J.P. Hultquist, "Constructing Stream Surfaces in Steady 3D Vector Fields,"Proc. Visualization 92, CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1992, pp. 171-178.
5. J. Stolk and J.J. van Wijk, "Surface Particles for 3D Flow Visualization," inAdvances in Scientific Visualization, F.H. Post and A.J.S. Hin, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. 119-130.
6. J.J. van Wijk, "Rendering Surface Particles,"IEEE CG&A, Vol. 13, No. 4, July 1993, pp. 18-24.
7. B.P. Leonard, "A Stable and Accurate Convective Modeling Procedure Based on Quadratic Upstream Interpolation,"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Eng., Vol. 19, No. 1, June 1979, pp. 59-98.
8. C.J.M. Lasance, "Numerical Simulation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer in a Television Set," inASME HTD (Heat Transfer Division) Vol. 171: Heat Transfer in Electronic Equipment, A. Ortega, D. Agonafer, and H. Webb, eds., ASME, New York, 1991, pp. 101- 108.
9. D.S. Ebert and R.E. Parent, "Rendering and Animation of Gaseous Phenomena by Combining Fast Volume and Scanline A-buffer Techniques,"Computer Graphics(Proc. Siggraph 90), Vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 361-376.
10. G. Sakas, "Modeling and Animating 3D Turbulence Using Spectral Synthesis,"The Visual Computer, Vol. 9, No. 4, Jan. 1993, pp. 200-212.
11. W. Merzkirch,Flow Visualisation, second ed., Academic Press, New York, 1987.
12. P.G. Buning, "Numerical Algorithms in CFD Post-Processing," inComputer Graphics and Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Von Karman Inst. Lecture Series 1989-07, Brussels, 1989.
13. H. Tennekes and J.L. Lumley,A First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
14. H.F.P. van den Boogaard, M.J.J. Hoogkamer, and A.W. Heemink, "Parameter Identification in Particle Models,"Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, Vol. 7, No. 2, June 1993, pp. 109-130.
15. G.K. Batchelor,An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1967.
16. R. Haber, "Visualization Techniques for Engineering Mechanics,"Computing Systems in Eng., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1990, pp. 37- 45.
17. M.P. Do Carmo,Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976.

Citation:
Jarke J. Van Wijk, Andrea J.S. Hin, Willem C. De Leeuw, Frits H. Post, "Three Ways to Show 3D Fluid Flow," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 33-39, Sept.-Oct. 1994, doi:10.1109/38.310722
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.