The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January/February (1994 vol.14)
pp: 23-29
ABSTRACT
<p> Virtual reality involves the creation and experience of environments. Its central objective is to place the participant in an environment that is not normally or easily experienced. This objective is satisfied by establishing a relationship between the participant and the created environment. Accordingly, we developed a three-tiered definition of VR that addresses respectively what VR is, how it is accomplished, and its effect/spl minus/both of VR on the participant and of the participant on the environment. The distinguishing "what" of VR is its extension of the human-computer interface. Engineering discipline requires precise and consistent definitions of each interfaced system. However, despite numerous studies, there are no such definitions of human perceptual systems. We must therefore rely on more qualitative definitions. As a basis for a conceptual VR model, we adopted J.J. Gibson's descriptions of human perceptual and muscle systems (J.J. Gibson, 1986). The model proposed includes a human model to show the experiential side of VR systems and a technical confection model for the creation of a participatory environment. Together these models define a conceptual VR system from a systems perspective that includes the human participant.</p>
CITATION
John N. Latta, David J. Oberg, "A Conceptual Virtual Reality Model", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.14, no. 1, pp. 23-29, January/February 1994, doi:10.1109/38.250915
REFERENCES
1. K.R. Boff and J.E. Lincoln, eds.,Engineering Data Compendium: Human Perception and Performance, Vols. 1. 2, and 3. Human Eng. Div., Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Lab., Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1988.
2. K. Boff, J.P. Thomas, and L. Kaufman, eds.,Handbook of Perception&Human Performance, Vols. I and II, John Wiley, New York, 1986.
3. E.G. Boring,Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology, Irvington, New York, 1977.
4. J.J. Gibson,The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1966.
5. J.J. Gibson,The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, N.J., 1986.
6. T.W. Malone, "What Makes Computer Games Fun?"Byte, Vol. 6, No. 12, Dec. 1981, pp. 258-277.
7. M. Csikszentmihalyi,Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper Perennial, New York, 1990.
8. C. Heeter, "Battle Tech Masters: Emergence of the First U.S. Virtual Subculture,"Multimedia Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, Winter 1992, pp. 65-70.
9. S.R. Bussolari et al., "The Use of Vestibular Models for Design And Evaluation of Flight Simulator Motion," AIAA Paper 89-3274, presented at the AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, 1989.
10. J.M. Rolfe and K.J. Staples,Flight Simulation, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1986.
11. Taylor, M. M., "Tactual Perception of Texture," inHandbook of Perception, Vol. 3: Biology of Perceptual Systems, E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedman, eds., Academic Press, New York, 1973, pp. 251- 272.
12. W. Robinett, "'Synthetic Experience: A Proposed Taxonomy,"Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 1992, pp. 229-247.
13. D. Zeltzer, "Autonomy, Interaction, and Presence,"Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 1, No. 1, Winter 1992, pp. 127-132.
15 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool