The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - May/June (1992 vol.12)
pp: 44-51, 54-58
ABSTRACT
<p>The sources of visual information that must be present to correctly interpret spatial relations in images, the relative importance of different visual information sources with regard to metric judgments of spatial relations in images, and the ways that the task in which the images are used affect the visual information's usefulness are discussed. Cue theory, which states that the visual system computes the distances of objects in the environment based on information from the posture of the eyes and from the patterns of light projected onto the retinas by the environment, is presented. Three experiments in which the influence of pictorial cues on perceived spatial relations in computer-generated images was assessed are discussed. Each experiment examined the accuracy with which subjects matched the position, orientation, and size of a test object with a standard by interactively translating, rotating, and scaling the test object.</p>
CITATION
Leonard C. Wanger, James A. Ferwerda, Donald P. Greenberg, "Perceiving Spatial Relationships in Computer-Generated Images", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.12, no. 3, pp. 44-51, 54-58, May/June 1992, doi:10.1109/38.135913
REFERENCES
1. R. Hall,Illumination and Color in Computer Generated Imagery, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.
2. G. Gouraud, "Continous Shading of Curved Surfaces,"IEEE Trans. Computers, Vol. C-20, No. 6, June 1971, pp. 623-629.
3. J. Farber and R.R. Rosinski, "Geometric Transformation of Pictured Space,"Perception, Vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1978, pp. 269-282.
4. V.S. Ramachandran, "Perceiving Shape from Shading,"Scientific American, Vol. 258, No. 2, Aug. 1988, pp. 58-65.
5. J.J. Gibson.The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1966.
6. A. Yonas, "Attached and Cast Shadows," inPerception and Pictorial Representation, C.F. Nodine, ed., Praeger, New York, 1979, pp. 100-109.
7. S. Ullman,The Interpretation of Visual Motion, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979.
8. G.A. Berkeley,A New Theory of Vision and Other Writings. Dutton, New York, 1922.
9. A. Skavensi and R. Steinman, "Control of Eye Position in the Dark,"Vision Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1970, pp. 193-203.
10. C. Graham,Vision and Visual Perception, Wiley, New York, 1965.
11. I. Carlbom and J. Paciorek, "Planar Geometric Projections and Viewing Transformations,"Computing Surveys, Vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 1978, pp. 465-502.
12. J.E. Cutting and R.T. Millard, "Three Gradients and the Perception of Flat and Curved Surfaces,"J. Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 113, No. 2, Feb. 1984, pp. 198-216.
13. J.J. Gibson,The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1966.
14. J.T. Todd and E. Mingolla, "Perception of Surface Curvature and Direction of Illumination from Patterns of Shading,"J. Experimental Psvchology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 9, No. 4, April 1983, pp. 583-595.
15. H. von Helmholtz.Handbook of Physiological Optics, Optical Society of America, New York, 1925.
16. J. Hochberg,Perception, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1978.
17. J. Farber and A. McConkie, "Linkages Between Apparent Depth and Motion in Linear Flow Fields,"Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 10, No. 2, Feb. 1977, p. 250.
18. F. Restle, "Moon Illusion Explained on the Basis of Relative Size,"Science, Vol. 167, No. 3,901, April 5, 1970, pp. 1,092-1,096.
19. W. Gogel, "The Organization of Perceived Space,"Psychologisch Forschung, Vol. 36, No. 2, Feb. 1973, pp. 195-247.
20. J. Blinn, "Jim Blinn's Corner: Me and My (Fake) Shadow,"IEEE CG&A, Vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 1988, pp. 82-86.
21. R.B. Darlington,Regression and Linear Models, McGraw Hill Series in Psychology, McGraw Hill, New York, 1990.
29 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool