The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March/April (1990 vol.10)
pp: 41-53
ABSTRACT
<p>An investigation of the quality of surface-shading algorithms using computer-simulated test objects is reported. Test results are presented for four algorithms: z-buffer gradient, gray-level gradient, adaptive gray-level gradient, and marching cubes with two extensions. It was found that gray-level gradient shading and marching cubes did not differ greatly, except for thin objects, where adaptive gray-level gradient shading was better. Transparent visualization using transparent gray-level gradient shading is examined. It is shown that although there is no way to assure the fidelity of transparent shading, it is useful when no other surface at all can be determined. Use of a combination of shading methods appears to yield the best visualization of the respective objects.</p>
CITATION
Ulf Tiede, Karl Heinz Hoehne, Michael Bomans, Andreas Pommert, Martin Riemer, Gunnar Wiebecke, "Surface Rendering", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.10, no. 2, pp. 41-53, March/April 1990, doi:10.1109/38.50672
REFERENCES
1. S.M. Goldwasser et al., "Physicians Workstation with Real-Time Performance,"CG&A, Vol. 5, No. 9, Sept. 1985, pp. 44-57.
2. R. Lenz et al., "Presentation and Perception of 3D Images" in K.H. Hoehne, ed.,Pictorial Information Systems in Medicine, NATO ASISeries F: Computer and Systems Science, Vol. 19, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986, pp. 459-468.
3. K.H. Hoehne and R. Bernstein, "Shading 3D Images from CT Using Gray Level Gradients,"IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, Vol. MI-5, No. 1, March, 1986, CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., pp. 45-47.
4. K.H. Hoehne et al., "Combined Surface Display and Reformatting for the 3D-Analysis of Tomographic Data,"Investigative Radiology, Vol. 22, No. 7, July, 1987, pp. 658-664.
5. K.H. Hoehne, M. Riemer, U. Tiede, "Viewing Operations for 3D-Tomographic Gray Level Data," in H.U. Lemke et al., eds., Computer Assisted Radiology (Proc. CAR), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 599-609.
6. W.K. Smith, D.S. Schlusselberg, D.J. Woodward, "Algorithms for Ray Tracing Volumetric Representations of Medical Image Data," in H.U. Lemke et al., eds.,Computer Assisted Radiology, (Proc. CAR), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 882-887.
7. W.E. Lorensen and H.E. Cline, "Marching Cubes: A High-Resolution 3D Surface Construction Algorithm,"Computer Graphics(Proc. Siggraph 87), ACM Press, New York, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1987, pp. 163-169.
8. M. Levoy, "Display of Surface from Volume Data,"CG&A, Vol. 8, No. 3, May, 1988, pp. 29-37.
9. R.A. Drebin, L. Carpenter, and P. Hanrahan, "Volume Rendering,"Computer Graphics(Proc. Siggraph 88), Vol. 22, No. 4. Aug. 1988, pp. 65-74.
10. K.H. Hoehne et al., 3D Visualization of Tomographic Volume Data Using the Generalized Voxel Model,"Proc. Chapel Hill Wkshp. Volume Visualization, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1989, pp. 51-57.
11. U. Tiede, K.H. Hoehne, and M. Riemer, "Comparison of Surface Rendering Techniques for 3D Tomographic Objects," in U. Lemke, ed.,Computer Assisted Radiology, (Proc. CAR), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 599-610.
12. M. Magnusson, R. Lenz, and P.E. Danielsson, "Evaluation of Methods for Shaded Surface Display of CT Volumes,"Proc. 9th ICPR, 1988, pp. 1287-1294.
13. A. Pommert et al., "Image Quality in Voxel-Based Surface Shading," in H.U. Lemke, eds.,Computer Assisted Radiology(Proc. CAR), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp. 737-741.
14. A. Pommert et al., "Simulation Studies for Quality Assurance of 3D Images from Computed Tomograms," in Todd-Pokropek and M.A. Viergever, eds., "The Formation, Handling and Evaluation of Medical Images," NATO ASI Series F,Computer and Systems Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, in press.
15. K.H. Hoehne et al., Display of Multiple 3D Objects Using the Generalized Voxel Model,Proc SPIE 914, SPIE, Bellingham, Wash., pp. 850-854.
16. M. Bomans et al., "3D Segmentation of MR Images of the Head for 3D Display,"IEEE Trans Med. Imaging, 1990, in press.
17. G. Wiebecke, "3D Visualisierung von Schwer Segmentierbaren Tomographschen Volumendaten," master's thesis, Univ. Hamburg, Hamburg, W. Germany, 1990.
18. L.S. Chen et al., "Surface Shading in the Cuberille Environment,"CG&A, Vol. 5, No. 12, December 1985, pp. 33-43.
19. U. Tiede et al., "Display Techniques for 3D Tomographic Volume Data,"Proc. NCGA 88, Vol. III, NCGA, Fairfax, Va., pp. 188-197.
20. U. Tiede," Entwurf, Implementation und Vergleich Verschiedener Reprasentationsformen fur die 3D-Darstellung von medizinischen Objekten," master's thesis, Univ. Hamburg, Hamburg, W. Germany, 1988.
21. C. Barillot et al. (1985) "3-D Representation of Anatomic Structures from CT Examinations,"Biostereometrics 85, Proc. SPIE 602, Bellingham. Wash., 1985, pp. 307-314.
22. D.H. Ballard, C.M. Brown,Computer Vision, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 82-83.
23. K.H. Hoehne et al., "Dynamic Three-dimensional Display of the Beating Heart from Four Dimensional MR Imaging Data," 74th Assembly of RSNA,Radiology, Vol. 169, supplement, 1988, p. 472.
24. K.H. Hoehne et al., "3D Visualization of Tomographic Volume Data Using the Generalized Voxel Model," The Visual Computer, Vol.6, No. 1, February 1990, pp. 28-36.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool