The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.07 - July (1986 vol.6)
pp: 39-50
Antony Williams , Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
The architecture described in this article evolved from an extensive research and experimentation effort in man-machine interaction in the Informatics Division of RAL. Its primary goal is to support research into improving user interface design. The architecture is based on the concept of direct manipulation without time-sequential user-machine dialogues. That is, the user forms his plan of action and carries it out in the sequence best suited to his needs. The system imposes no syntactic structure on the command language, and thus does not enforce particular time sequences. Such a model should extend to cover interaction with dynamic processes as well as simple modification of stored data. The long-term goal of this effort is to evolve the design of a truly general-purpose user interface management system as part of the client architecture. The activities at present include developing a window manager, including defining a client-server interface; developing a preliminary toolkit for user interfaces; and applying the toolkit to the development of an interactive post processor for viewing and manipulating the results of finite element analysis.
Antony Williams, "An Architecture for User Interface R&D", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.6, no. 7, pp. 39-50, July 1986, doi:10.1109/MCG.1986.276815
1. PhilipHayes, EugeneBall, and RajReddy, "Breaking the Man-Machine Communication Barrier," Computer Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 19-30 Mar. 1981
2. S.K.Lee, W.Buxton, and K.C.Smith, "A Multi-Touch Three-Threesional Touch Sensitive Tablet," Proc. ACM CHI 85 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems Apr. 1985pp. 21-26
3. AdeleGoldberg, Smalltalk-80: The Interactive Programming Environment , Addison-Wesley 1984
4. AlanKay, "The Dynabook: Past, Present, and Future," Proc. ACM Conf. History Personal Workstations Jan. 1986 (to appear)
5. GuntherPfaff, User Interface Management Systems Proc. Seeheim Workshop 1985
6. W.Buxton, M. R.Lamb, D.Sherman, and K. C.Smith, "Toward a Comprehensive User Interface Management System," Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH 83) Mar. 1983 Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 35-42
7. JoelleCoutaz, "Abstractions for User Interface Design," Computer Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 21-38 Sept. 1985
8. S.Card and T.Moran, "User Technology-from Pointing to Pondering," Proc. ACM Conf. History Personal Workstations Jan. 1986 (to appear)
9. D. S.Rosenthal, "Managing Graphical Resources," Computer Graphics Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 38-45 Jan. 1983
10. Inside Macintosh , McGraw Hill 1985
11. PostScript Language Reference Manual 1985 Adobe Systems Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
12. J.Warnock and D. K.Wyatt, "A Device Independent Graphics Imaging Model for Use with Raster Devices," Computer Graphics Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 313-319 Mar. 1982
13. Martin E.Newell and Carlo H.Sequin, "The Inside Story on Self-Intersecting Polygons," Lambda Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 20-24 1980 Spring
14. RobPike, LeoGuibas, and DanIngalls, "Bitmap Graphics," , AT&T Bell Laboratories 1984 SIGGRAPH 84 course notes
15. PhilipHayes, PedroSzekely, and RichardLerner, "Design Alternatives for User Interface Management Systems Based on Experience with Cousin," Proc. ACM CHI 85 Conf; Human Factors in Computing Systems Apr. 1985pp. 169-175
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool