|
| This Article | ||
| | ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
 Digg  Furl  Spurl  Blink  Simpy  Google  Del.icio.us  Y!MyWeb | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| F.C. Crow, "A Comparison of Antialiasing Techniques," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40-48, January-March, 1981. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MCG.1981.1673810, author = {F.C. Crow}, title = {A Comparison of Antialiasing Techniques}, journal ={IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, issn = {0272-1716}, year = {1981}, pages = {40-48}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MCG.1981.1673810}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications TI - A Comparison of Antialiasing Techniques IS - 1 SN - 0272-1716 SP40 EP48 EPD - 40-48 A1 - F.C. Crow, PY - 1981 KW - null VL - 1 JA - IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications ER - | |||
Three antialiasing techniques were applied to a scene of moderate complexity. Early results suggest that prefiltering is still the most computationally effective method.
Citation:
F.C. Crow, "A Comparison of Antialiasing Techniques," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40-48, Jan.-March 1981, doi:10.1109/MCG.1981.1673810
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.